>>13350559Let me clarify for any who are confused.
827 women were analysed (these women all had completed pregnancies = either birth or abortion)
----------------------
700 women vaccinated in 3rd trimester (from week 28 onwards)
HENCE 127 women vaccinated before week 27
----------------------
104 women had spontaneous abortions (dead baby <20 weeks)
HENCE 104/127 is the current failure rate of pregnancies
82%
----------------------
>>13349308Shills will try and argue that 80-90% is the normal abortion rate. This is INCORRECT.
Here are the FACTS:
>80% of all pregnancies end in the first trimester>10-26% of all pregnancies end in abortionHENCE: 80% * 10% to 80% * 26% which is 8 - 21% of pregnancies should end in the first trimester
82% is very different from 8-21%
-------------------------
LASTLY, shills will try and claim that we can't just separate the 127 women from the 700 women.
THIS IS INCORRECT
Any medical professional knows that the 1st trimester is very different from the 3rd trimester in terms of risks to the baby. This is why we have teratogenic drugs which cannot be taken in the 1st trimester.
It is INCORRECT to assume the vaccine will have the same effects in both periods.
