>>13341693>>13341699>>13341713>>13341726>>13341767>>13341791when first approaching the concept of transgenderism one asks what point there is to going through such a transition. in the current world it is especially not reasonable with the rise of feminism. the abolishment of gender roles and stereotypes makes gender nothing more than an aesthetic. of course, craving an aesthetic is radically insane so one searches for more reasonable incentives for such a transition and finds social interactions as a possible cause. if one looks like a woman, one is treated like a woman, perhaps it is easier to befriend women, however even this does not justify such radical of a transition. let's look at an ideal society where the genders are heavily encouraged into certain roles, leading to less economic gain but children being raised in an ideal manner, creating a beautiful environment of significantly more good people. here a transition becomes a lot more reasonable, if one is a man in a woman's body, one is pushed, however not forced, to become a mother, a much less desirable position for a man. however, would this truly be enough to justify such a radical transition? a disappearance of the face your family has grown to love? the financial cost? would it not be better to just face the social consequences of breaking gender roles? after one's attempts to justify such a transition, one looks at the actual state of transgenderism. he is horrified. it is almost entirely about aesthetic, even when the social incentives of a transition are talked about, it is almost always superficial things such as the pronouns you are referred to. but perhaps this is just an incredibly ugly part of human nature, perhaps humans are built to obsess over gendered aesthetics, right? one can be doubtful of this by asking how they would feel if they were in the body of another gender and realising that it wouldnt be that disastrous but of course this isnt a very good argument, you arent actually...
