This is Amateur Hour. This is for all of you with "Big Ideas" which are probably bullshit but you want to argue about them and try to assert yourself.
Everybody knows science is pretty gay and boring, and since every non-empirical profession consists of making shit up and trying to sell it to people, there's no reason science folks shouldn't get a piece of that pie.
I'm not a great person, but I love to argue about things. If you have a big ego and little to back it up, if you can make name-drop some vague scientific concepts to "legitimize your claim" without any sort of measurement or studies. That's what we're all about here.
>>>/bant/13046594
>I ask myself "What is the purpose or meaning of life?"
>I don't know
>I ask "What is life?"
>Life is sugar fire
>I ask "What is the purpose of fire?"
>The purpose of fire is to reduce potential chemical energy in accordance with entropy
>Thus
>The purpose of life, including human life, is to reduce potential chemical energy in accordance with entropy
My reason for coming here is that I tend to base my philosophy of the world from a very minimal public school education regarding science. This argument, "the meaning of life" demonstrates that I did get to the 9th grade. With such academic merit under my belt, now I flex this argument with fervor to try and seem enlightened and intelligent.
In the past week, I've written over 50,000 words on /bant/ alone, generally arguing with people. That's longer than the Great Gatsby, but as you science-types know, words are pretty much worthless and meaningless.
I have attached a long article I wrote a while ago in which I talk at length about this argument in green-text. It's has "some scientific elements" at least, and if you've got some free time, want to argue, want to banter, come here.
Everybody knows science is pretty gay and boring, and since every non-empirical profession consists of making shit up and trying to sell it to people, there's no reason science folks shouldn't get a piece of that pie.
I'm not a great person, but I love to argue about things. If you have a big ego and little to back it up, if you can make name-drop some vague scientific concepts to "legitimize your claim" without any sort of measurement or studies. That's what we're all about here.
>>>/bant/13046594
>I ask myself "What is the purpose or meaning of life?"
>I don't know
>I ask "What is life?"
>Life is sugar fire
>I ask "What is the purpose of fire?"
>The purpose of fire is to reduce potential chemical energy in accordance with entropy
>Thus
>The purpose of life, including human life, is to reduce potential chemical energy in accordance with entropy
My reason for coming here is that I tend to base my philosophy of the world from a very minimal public school education regarding science. This argument, "the meaning of life" demonstrates that I did get to the 9th grade. With such academic merit under my belt, now I flex this argument with fervor to try and seem enlightened and intelligent.
In the past week, I've written over 50,000 words on /bant/ alone, generally arguing with people. That's longer than the Great Gatsby, but as you science-types know, words are pretty much worthless and meaningless.
I have attached a long article I wrote a while ago in which I talk at length about this argument in green-text. It's has "some scientific elements" at least, and if you've got some free time, want to argue, want to banter, come here.
