>>13337663Appearantly half get 632.
I don't have 780-800 stats handy. I don't see any particular reason to believe there is a "fat tail" of white intelligence (And consequently relatively less whites in the 700-780 range) and Asians are midwit central other than /pol/ self-delusions.
>>13337672The first university system was pretty much entirely classist and was based on connections and ability to pay on the idea where blue blooded elites would become captains of industry.
After that came the meritocratic system where universities discriminated based largely on IQ and conscientiousness on the idea that smart hard working people should be the captains of industry.
Now we're moving to a pseudo racial equity system, where different ethnic groups fight over an unspoken quota, and your ranking in each quota largely is determined by IQ + conscientiousness, with justification being the many articles you see in the press about "Diverse companies being more successful" although that's really potentially confusing cause and effect since successful companies are under the most pressure to diversify. However whites are typically not given any protection under this system on the grounds that "historic inequity/racism" needs to be addressed, in spite of the rise of Asians really making it plainly obvious that the "historic inequity/racism" theory does not explain even the majority of differences between racial groups. The rationalisations are getting more and more Copernican over time.
This will net a benefit to black people. I think the true aberration is how whites seem perfectly content to allow discrimination against themselves, not to mention their placid attitude towards how they're on track to eventually become a stateless people not even doing so much as entrenching legal protections for themselves in law. There is this weird humble arrogance to whites that they're so on top that others need their charity and a denial of reality that they're fucked.
