>>13342255First, the last paragraph is ridiculous.
>"The bottom line is that not only is the new technology faster to respond to a new viral pandemic, but so much safer and much more clearly scientifically designed," he said. "The S protein vaccines are so much cleaner, so much more carefully defined, and so much lower risk. All you're seeing is one protein from that virus. So the chances for ADE are much slimmer than with any of the older ways for making virus vaccines."mRNA appeal is that, on paper, it is supposed to be perfect, but myocarditis alone shows that it is not behaving as promised. It is a strange "appeal to authority", except the authority doesn't even exist here.
Second, she says ADE appears quickly using dengue as an example. The thing is, there is already 4 varieties of dengue while covid19 hasn't changed much. If ADE appears, it is likely that it will be after some time when the virus has slightly mutated (like the delta variant).
Third, she acts as if ADE is a solved problem and everything about it is known. It is exactly the opposite, it is something discovered recently and our knowledge of how it works is actually as complete as our knowledge about autoimmune diseases (zero). Considering SRAS1 had it, the only reasonable mindset is prudence, not #YOLO.
That is only what I have on my mind. There are probably more bullshit in that article.
Basically, almost certainly a pfizer shill.
And for the midwits, an article that uses only positive language and raises no objection whatsoever is not a fair article.
