>>13339487>Remember how that source you provided stated that those two things are unrelated?No sorry, I don't. So I reread it, it's not there.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/human-activity-in-china-and-india-dominates-the-greening-of-earth-nasa-study-shows“This long-term data lets us dig deeper,” said Rama Nemani, a research scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center, in California’s Silicon Valley, and a co-author of the new work. “When the greening of the Earth was first observed, we thought it was due to a warmer, wetter climate and fertilization from the added carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, leading to more leaf growth in northern forests, for instance. Now, with the MODIS data that lets us understand the phenomenon at really small scales, we see that humans are also contributing.”
we see that humans are also contributing.”
Also contributing
You understand that they are not saying it's all manmade right?
>>13339487>Sure, kid, and how much warmer and greener will it be in 50 years? 100 years?Don't know for certain, warmer and greener than it is now.
>>13339487>Do you think it would happen before the environment collapses because it can't adapt quick enough?What environment collapses if we reach 800 ppm? Does all the fish die or what do you think happens? You said I should read up on it, you know, if you can't explain it, you probably don't understand it.
>>13339487>I'm certain we'd already be drooling retards at that point because of the CO2 concentration so in a sense it's impossible to ever know.Ahh yes, some jews published a paper that showed humans had decreased cognitive abilities at higher levels of co2, meanwhile the crews on nuclear submarines will work at 2000 to 5000 ppm for months at a time.
