Quoted By:
The vaccine doesn't even necessarily protect against getting infected.
It doesn't protect against severe illness.
In some cases it may exacerbate severe illness.
It has a myriad of potentially fatal side effects many of which vax shills will chalk down to "correlation" or straight up deny. A family member of mine came down with Guillain-Barré syndrome almost right after getting the vax, which the NHS will not admit to having anything to do with the vax. (This is a syndrome that kills one in four who get it). The longterm effects of the vax are yet to be known, but will probably be extremely adverse as well.
When getting the vax, you are subjecting yourself to all of these risks. When not getting the vax, shills argue that the risk from covid is higher. Not even counting that a third of covid infections are asymptomatic (maybe even more), whereas vaccines ALWAYS have a side effect, the risk of covid is actually divided between the risk of even encountering the disease. The risk of getting a serious illness or death from covid is first predicated on actually encountering it, and also the severity of the initial contact. Meanwhile, if you go for the vax, there is no division of the risk, it is simply a risk of whether you have a severe adverse reaction or not. Covid has to find you, meanwhile, vaxxers are lining up in droves to inject what is basically a disease in it's own right.
So no, covid is not more deadly than the vax. For young people, it may turn out to be worse. I am not going near that fucking experimental poison and if not wanting blood clots, brain damage, myocardtis, Guillain-Barré syndrome etc etc, makes me some insane conspiracy theorist or "anti science", so be it.
