>>13320717it it even accounts for all your retarded "discussion" patterns
if you have an issue with reddit links here is the pastebin version
https://pastebin.com/uXSCjwZKCommon vegan debate tactics/fallacies:
- Nirvana fallacy: "There's no point in eating animal products because everything can be solved with a perfect vegan diet, supplements and genetic predisposition."
- Proof by example: "Some people say they are vegan. Therefore, animal products are unnecessary."
- Appeal to authority: Pointing to opinion papers written by vegan shills as proof that their diet is adequate.
- Definist fallacy: "... as far as is possible and practicable." (Can be used to defend any case of hypocrisy)
- Special pleading: "It's never ethical to harm animals for food, except when we 'accidentally'[1] hire planes to rain poison from the sky." (You can trigger their cognitive dissonance[2] by pointing that out.)
- Appeal to emotion: Usage of words exclusive to humans (rape, murder, slavery, ... ) in the context of animals.
- Fallacy fallacy: "Evolution is a fallacy because it's natural."
- Texas sharpshooter fallacy: "A third of grains are fed to livestock. Therefore, a third of all crops are grown as animal feed."
- False dilemma: "Producing only livestock is less sustainable than producing only crops, so we should only produce crops."
- False cause: Asserting that association infers causation because it's the best data they have. ("Let's get rid of firefighters because they correlate to forest fires")
- Moving the goalposts: Whenever a vegan is cornered, they will dodge and change the subject to one of their other pillars (Ethics, Health, Environment or Sustainability) as seen here[3].
- Ad hominem: Nit-picking statements out of context, attacking them in an arrogant manner, and then proclaiming everything someone says is wrong while not being able to refute the actual point. (see Kresser vs Wilks debate)
it is really that fucking good, i congratulate the person who did it
