>>13320241Like you say it's your choice.
Putting aside the obvious global push to vaccinate against a virus that has killed around 4 million (0.05%) of the population.
There is a clear financial benefit to get as many of these shots into arms as possible, there is now the reality that "boosters" will be required going forward for who knows how long.
There is evidence that the current leaky vaccines lead to more potentially dangerous mutations.
There is evidence to suggest that the vaccines efficiency is greatly reduced against new variants and no-one knows how it will fair against further mutations.
There is evidence to show the spoke protein does not stay localized to the injection site and can cause a concentrated build up in the reproductive organs, heart and lungs which can cause damage through an auto immune response.
Despite what has been said in this thread, there was no trial of the vaccine on pregnant woman PRIOR to release.
The vaccine was shown to have the benefit of preventing symptomatic COVID-19 not stop you catching sars-cov-2. Meaning you can still spread the virus without knowing you are a carrier.
There is evidence to suggest the vaccine can reduced hospitalization risks.
There is evidence to suggest it is the spike protein itself that can lead to clotting which is present in the virus and is manufactured in the body if vaccinated.
There is evidence to suggest there are alternative treatments such as Ivermectin which have a far lower risk profile.
There is evidence to suggest extreme auto immune response to both the virus and the vaccine.
There has never been a recorded vaccination in history that has had the risk profile associated with covid-19 vaccines that hasn't been pulled.
There is evidence to suggest prophylaxis is more effective at reducing the risk of having severe symptoms.
There are obviously no long term studies on the effect of the vaccine or nor the virus on the human body.
The truth is. We don't know.