>>13313641>explain to me why a perpetual motion machine cannot be made using gravity and magnetism, for starters, "what is the difference between the two". I hear one is a fancy description for "mass attracts to mass" but a magnet is a mass so I don't understand what the difference actually is.
>two effectively unlimited and free sources of energy>"How"Oh wait, we don't know how either work (assuming they're different that is). Maybe that's why?
>>13313874>energy which can be effectively free with the clever application of magnetism.>Energy is somehow transmuted or actually used in creating an archform in a dielectric with magnets.It boils water, that's all your energy source is doing. Nowhere does it actually interact with the magnets/copper wire that is WIRELESSLY generating a current.
>>13314990>Whoa here's an even crazier idea what of there was some way to make some kind of panel that turns sunlight directly into electricity. >Whoa, light is an electromagnetic phenomena just like electricity.And I've also heard some morons believe it somehow has a "speed" too.
>>13316149>Did you know that sunlight is actually not available at all for half of every day? So how do you see at night? How do you even exist in the first place at night? What is energizing you into existence?
>But if it could keep up the momentum of a hyper efficient machine that will run through the night and bad weather, you might just have somethingImagine if the whole planet rotated and had a magnetic field that we could use to generate electricity. Wouldn't that be neat?
