>>13329045His physics theory is that all matter including dark matter is comprised of *photons*, which are spheres with volume. He glosses over any finer detail to reality with this abstraction. These photons are travelling at C in any linear direction and they can spin up to C at their equator. In his paper on superposition he proposes the theory that while spinning at C they can acquire a second spin about one of their poles, giving an effective radius and spin energy of 2x. Once this second spin reaches C a third spin can be added, and so on. Most of the photons in the universe have only their initial spin and amount to dark matter.
The 2x photon is an infra-red photon, and the spin stacking continues through the EM spectrum up until gamma rays, and then electrons, and then protons, which travel slower than C because they interact too often with the single spin photons.
Protons have so much spin energy that they act as a bi-directional vortex pulling in the single spin photons (cw at the north pole and ccw at the south pole by convention) and ejecting them as a disc like field at their equator. Electrons also get sucked into protons and act like plugs. A Helium ion is two of these protons forced closely together which causes their vortexes to combine rather than repel.
All of this information is dotted around his essays.
So, if all of this is true, and if experimentally we find that "Pi=4", then there' would be a fundamental reason. It may be that the single spin photons interfere with the motion of atoms, or because the fundamental spin of the photons follows Miles calculus theories, since his photons aren't points but volumes. I'm not smart enough to just confirm or dismiss any of this myself mentally. When I have more free time I'm going to try writing simulations, but desu it's not my job. It's a shame that mainstream physicists won't even try to rule out the theory with a supercomputer.
