>>13309200>Then how do you explain something like intelligence?you have to define intelligence for this question to be meaningful, and if human thought is your idea of intelligence then I would argue that intelligence is not complex or even remarkable compared to things we take for granted like the hydrostatic equilibrium of stars for example
>it seems that intelligence is trying to arrange the chaos in some kind of a patternidk about this. all energy in the universe was once unified and as a result I think energy has a tendency to clump up and draw together
>what is intelligence then?you should have asked this question first, and provided your own clear answer before anything else. without this step your line of questioning is a mess.
>how come it was born out of chaos?it wasn’t. literally impossible for our initial state to have been any more efficient at arranging energy as it was condensed into a functionally invisible point
>or maybe chaos is something we can't comprehend with our minds and until we do we just keep the constant struggle?it seems like you understand the philosophical foundation of questions like these. the reality is that the supply of satisfying answers will never catch up to the infinite expanse of what cannot be known
