>>13310659I was just trolling, what I'm saying is that it's true that a society that values intelligence produces more intelligent people, but ironically through eugenic practice.
even our anti-eugenic society produces meek and agreeable people eugenetically, it looks dysgenic if you're not an useful idiot or part of the cryptocracy, but even if you take the ideal smartscentric nigerian society and add participation awards to math Olympics that you somehow transformed into religious festivals, make anti-eugenics propaganda and anti-retardophobia classes in schools it's an undeniable fact that it will produce eugenic effects.
the only way to be truly anti-eugenics and still have a functioning society is to make the society around mindless consumerism and paddle dysgenic propaganda. I'm saying, people will naturally practice eugenics to uphold the values around which you construct society like that, so might as well skip the "change society" step and directly change genes. still people, including me, can't deny the sense that natural change is better than artificial one, I don't consider society artificial (ideally) more like supranatural
