>>13307657It's funny as shit that neocons, neolibs, zionists, and commies all get along so well. It's like the corporate sellout/normie/authoritarian sphere.
Then you have the socialists, greens, libertarians, nationalists, and classical liberals on the other side, and they seem to represent actual people and actual value systems. Like even if I don't agree with a nationalist, or a socialist, or a libertarian, I can still understand there values and their beliefs, and they genuinely seem to have a set of principles.
Like if you are a hardcore republican or democrat, like say a Romney voter and you worship the GOP and the American political system, a support """The War on Terror""" then you support the establishment and probably have more in common with Antifa and BLM than with genuine conservative voices in the Libertarian or Nationalist spheres.
Similarly, if you are like a Libertarian or Green or something, you probably have actual values and principles, and you actually have more in common with nationalists or socialist or classical liberals, etc.
Red, blue, left, right, these labels are useful to some extent, but politics is really about establishment ideologies vs common/authentic ideology. I don't know what your political views are, and it's honestly impossible to gauge based on the discussion in this thread, but if you support """The War on Terror""", then you are an establishment cuck. Simple as. It's not really a left or right issue. I have very unconventional views, and I follow both far-right and far-left scholars and journalists, and the smart people on both sides of the aisle hate the government, the corporations, and the globalist """War on Terror""".
