>>13299039>How is science dealing with nukeschauvinism and American exceptionalism was at play here too but the majority of scientists got huge funding and had their career got boosted. some scientists rejected working there and even opposed it. even oppenheimer rejected working on the hydrogen bomb because it's too strong
>begin denying consciousness, probably the most absurd claim ever made.why do you find this so hard to accept? seems like you are the one who is being dogmatic
>political philosophy.this is one of the areas philosophy still has, although i think analytical philosophy is much more useful here than continental
>Examples?religion, fascism, any idea/ideology that disregards human life, any modern or old thinktank defending governments/leader's immoral actions, etc
>, it doesn't have the faintest clue what consciousness isit does, you are just unable to accept the other (more) possible answers
>philosophy of mind is still essential.not when neuroscience, neurology and modern psychology exist
