>>13290422>Because it doesn'tSun's still shining so no, you're wrong.
>at that point you have a stream of electrons propagating through space in what's literally called radiation.Technically not "traveling" then I guess, but yes you've explained why a material conductor cannot exist. The energy is still being transmitted and can be transformed back into a "current" with no material, and no "travel". So it's not a "Superconductor", it just does everything a superconductor does with no material.
>Conduction implies the thing is moving along a series of other things or between things."Like I said "the convention is that a super conductor" only refers to something which is material."
"You can't have your cake and eat it too, especially when your "cake" is only edible when it doesn't exist as something physical."
>electrons flow through copper via a series of jumps between holes in the valence shell of the copper atoms making up the lattice structure of the conductor.If you think anything is "flowing" let alone "electron particles" in a solid copper line with magnets passing over I feel sorry for you. The copper is polarized, it doesn't travel whatsoever.
>jumps between holesLike "space", the massive hole with no resistance to stop fuck all where light can be linearly and circularly polarized.
>Either way, you're coming off as some ignorant fuck >_>>.t. nuclear engineerLike you know how the magnets work either, embellished water boiler.
