>>13288387>except wind is slowed down with all kinds of consequencesPray tell? Is one of those destroying the wind? Will wind magically stop blowing in an area once you build wind power plants? If the answer is no, then wind is in fact renewable.
>it IS bad.Wrong, it's sand, burying ground into ground is in fact not bad.
>only an american would think burying your shit is a good idea>Nooooooo you can't bury sand!!!Again you can recycle them if you like, recycling them costs more energy though which would be a worse result for the environment.
>except when there is no sun of courseThe night and clouds are in fact factored into the calculations, solar is still far superior even when accounting for the actual real life output, inefficiencies included.
>and with cheaper you obviously mean it's paid by tax payerNo, it's just cheaper, see
>>13287991Tax payers considering it's even cheaper than that (or rather nuclear is even more expensive) because the risks of nuclear are passed onto the tax payer.
