>>13279057Well, currently without saying, I don't know.
I can speculate purely on a level of admitted sophistry, just like anyone else.
First of all there exists problem which can be defined mathematically but cannot be solved.
First of all mathematics isn't real, it's a development of human intuition (using divine information).
Physics depends on mathematics being true, but really it's only true mathematically.
That's all.
Physics is phenomenological, the things that happen simply happen not dictated by human reason.
There is always existence before the existence of reason.
Mathematics is like plastic wrap we can wrap it around things that exist, say a rubik's cube. We now can generate a mathematical system that can describe it mathematically, like a language, not the language of the universe RETARD NIGGERS. Now wrap that around the entire universe and you a create the basis for a system of the universe.
It isn't the universe itself, it isn't even a profound truth, it's just human reasoning.
Our system that describes those problems may not be accurate enough to answer certain questions about those systems.
Is the mind complete isn't a real question, basically.
can the mind be mathematically defined? so far no, could we know if it ever can or not, so far no.
Clearly there is some system that defined the mind, in by its existence.
Your question inherently makes no sense.