>>13278748Ethics committees are literally the physical manifestation of irrational attempts at controlling a reality the members of the committees refuse to reconcile with.
If ethics is ever going to be more than some weird social lever of power for those who wish to game a society into obeying their desires for how the world should be run... It would need to fundamentally change.
People attempting to mete out ethics would need to account for real world conditions and empathize with all parties involved in the affairs with which the meddle.
Ex: No one in Europe should have had to die as a result of refugee migration... The people calling it ethical had to willfully ignore and distort the reality of the situation to arrive at the conclusion:
-There would be no adverse effects on the host populations taking in the refugees
-The rape, murder, sharia ghettos, bombing, etc... that occurred as a result are in any way an acceptable outcome or side effect of the policy they set.
Any /pol/tard race realist could have predicted the loss of life and harm that would result by mixing an islamic culture with a western socialist culture.
To get to the point:
-The child was likely kept alive for 3 reasons
1. The doctor's ego
2. The profit margin associated with the services rendered
3. There is no current positive connotation to death or the alleviation of suffering through death on western medicine.
Ethics probably had nothing to do with the kid.
