>>13275886Of course blue shirt guy starts out with an anecdote and, assuming his anecdote is true an accurate, confuses correlation with causation and improbability with impossibility. Additionally, the whole notion of a intramuscular injection of lipid nanoparticles causing a heart attack two minutes after injection is absurd. The spike protein is completely irrelevant at that timescale.
Next they talk about how free spike proteins are cytotoxic and my cause adverse reactions pretty soon after vaccination. If only we had some mechanism to test for adverse reactions like, oh, I don't know, clinical trials?
And now blue shirt guy is back to his random anecdotes. Oh, a woman had an uncommon miscarriage? It must be because of the vaccine she had months ago! Forget the fact that in a population of billions where both events are common (30%-50% vaccinated, 20% miscarriage rate) you would certainly expect there to be random coincidences, surely this anecdote is the smoking gun! Okay, maybe it's not the smoking gun, but if it's piled on to a bunch of other similar anecdotes it'll make it sound like there's a strong argument to be made! Checkmate, vaxxers.
What an amazing introductory argument. You would think if he had evidence of adverse events during the clinical trials not being recorded, statistics showing an unexpected increase in certain conditions among vaccinated individuals, or a government whistleblower demonstrating how the FDA is ignoring adverse event reports he would have started with it. I guess we'll just have to be baited along until this genius comes through and finally delivers something of substance.
Maybe I should throw away my conscience and start manipulating and making money off of the idiots on this board.
