>>13275177there's "[not] having the mental capacity to understand his brilliance" and not being able to effectively portray an idea in a manner where those you're discussing ideas with can even effectively understand you. Here, let us look at simply the abstract of his (keep in mind) *56 page proof* of the purported fucking model of the entire universe.
>"SCSPL relates space, time and object by means of conspansive duality and conspansion, an SCSPL-grammatical process featuring an alternation between dual phases of existence associated with design and actualization and related to the familiar wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics."now, before noting how that sentence was unnecessarily long and jumbled, you might ask, "what is SCSPL?" well, according to Langan himself, it is
>"a reflexive intrinsic languagecharacterized not only by self-reference and recursive self-definition, but full self-configuration and selfexecution (reflexive read-write functionality). "
ahh, so SCSLP is the language of reality defined as a set of information (not matter or energy, which is simply semantics regardless) that... is able to reference itself, define itself (not simply define itself, but do so recursively, which either means it does so in the sense of being reducible towards a base case, which doesn't make much sense on its own, or is recursive in the sense it is self-referencing, which is redundant), configure itself, and execute itself (with reflexive (there's that word again) read/write functionality).
ahhh but hang on, what does he mean by "conspansion" and "conspansive duality"?? And reality is a language? ohh right it's based on, as Chris himself says, the "Reality Principle" which says that "the universe is self contained, and according to infocognitive monism, it regresses to a realm of nil constraint (unbound telesis or UBT) from which it must refine itself."
do you see what I mean? it's all fucking blibber blabber
