>>13275052This has to be bait, but whatever it's still interesting to refine my arguments against trannies.
>>13275052>"Woman" is a cultural idea based on a set of preconceptions of what a woman's body is supposed to look like, how they're supposed to sound, how they are supposed to act, etc. all of which a "biological male" can replicate.I mostly agree with this. In my view, the idea of female characteristics comes from the actions that biological females take. Not all biological females act in this way, but if you were to stereotype the actions and other characteristics of females, you would get a certain set of characteristics which I am calling female characteristics.
Where I disagree is how you combine gender and sex into a single thing.
>Woman as a concept is much more broad than the set of persons who are cis-genered and female sexed.If you replace woman with female characteristics, I agree with this mostly.
My definition of woman is purely based on biology. XX chromosomes make you a woman, that's it.
If woman is this totally arbitrary category, then why would a tranny chop his dick off? Why would he insist on being called a certain pronoun? Why would he insist on playing in women's sports? Why would he insist on using the women's bathroom?
