/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13272941

198KiB, 789x600, 2+2=5.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

TWO PLUS TWO = ?

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 10:46:43 2021 No.13272941 View Reply Original Report

This shit is getting so confusing, can someone please just tell me the answer to this question?:
>2+2=?

I thought I knew the answer but these eggheads are confusing me:
https://twitter.com/wtgowers/status/1295992753831149568
https://twitter.com/wtgowers/status/1317850753936097283
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1290219038614798338.html
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1291055417989226499.html
https://youtu.be/0WPY5cfOOIM

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1290479330477240320.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 10:48:08 No.13272942 Report

Quoted By: >>13274887 >>13282491

>>13272941
They dumb. 2+2=4. Period

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 10:50:34 No.13272947 Report

Quoted By: >>13272984 >>13273002 >>13273068 >>13273556 >>13273575 >>13273640 >>13274887 >>13274994

>>13272941
The answer is if you're a jackass you can use a definition/interpretation completely contrary to the one everyone else uses, and then feel smug about it.
Kind of like how you can walk up to people and say "fuck you" and then when they get mad you can pretend you're speaking your very own dialect where those words actually mean "hello." Then berate them for being dumb etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:26:21 No.13272982 Report

Quoted By:

So all manlets are actually 6ft?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:27:24 No.13272984 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272947
there was a time that people used pigeons to communicate. and that was more real than internet

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:29:30 No.13272995 Report

Quoted By: >>13273006

I define the word 'nigger' to mean mosquito. Now if you'll excuse me I need to go gas some niggers outside.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:29:49 No.13272996 Report

Quoted By: >>13279770

you don't even have the mental capacity to watch a fucking 9 minute video or read a short article. fuck off back to your adhd board.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1623580731157.jpg, 216KiB, 1419x1392

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:31:56 No.13273002 Report

Quoted By: >>13273467

>>13272947
>The answer is if you're a jackass you can use a definition/interpretation completely contrary to the one everyone else uses, and then feel smug about it.
But they'd never do something like that, right?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO d7ig3cp-a7b9c9d7-c725-45ab-abfa- (...).jpg, 56KiB, 457x604

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:32:40 No.13273006 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272995
kek nice
now if you don't mind I have to show my mom that wooden doors can't kill rats.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:34:39 No.13273011 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
These people are retarded.

t. mathfag

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:44:27 No.13273031 Report

Quoted By: >>13273215

>>13272941
>This shit is getting so confusing, can someone please just tell me the answer to this question?:
>>2+2=?
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... are just symbols that we use (as is + and =)

1 = |
2 = ||
3 = |||
4 = ||||
5 = |||||
6 = ||||||
.
.
.

So 2 + 2 = || + || = |||| = 4

Now suppose you made some changes.,,

1 = |
3 = ||
2 = |||
4 = ||||
6 = |||||
5 = ||||||
.
.
.

Now suddenly 2 + 2 = ||| + ||| = |||||| = 5

So how is this useful? It isn't. It's just mental acrobatics to appease dumb contrarian nogs on Twitter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 11:52:21 No.13273045 Report

Quoted By: >>13273065 >>13273085 >>13274725 >>13274887

If you are rounding everything..
2.3+2.4=4.7
I dunno.
Seriously why are they choosing this?
Isn't it a literal quote from 1984?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 12:04:04 No.13273065 Report

Quoted By:

>>13273045
see
>>13273057
Essentially because Poe's Law applies equally well to the the people being mocked as the people doing the mocking, so sjws are incredibly easy to bait.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 12:05:01 No.13273068 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272947
This

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO DumbStupidNigger.jpg, 582KiB, 1182x1600

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 12:15:34 No.13273085 Report

Quoted By:

>>13273045
>Seriously why are they choosing this?
>Isn't it a literal quote from 1984?
They are trolling us, they are literally spitting in our faces.
They've done shit like this a couple other times where they see what they can get away with in broad day light for shits and giggles; smug bastards think they're funny ay? Well I won't have it, I WON'T HAVE IT!!
Fuck you antichristian niggers, fuck you and your god, I'm oing to kill and rape them all, fuckyou fuck you fucoyku fuk yu fckyo
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 12:48:11 No.13273147 Report

Quoted By:

Muffugn Kikes be fuggn wit us & shit. Dafuk they problem? smdh

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 12:49:33 No.13273149 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
>2+2=5
fucking 1984

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 13:19:49 No.13273214 Report

Quoted By:

This is like the Tower of Babel.
We tried so hard to come up with universal definitions, but God struck us down and fragmented it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 13:20:01 No.13273215 Report

Quoted By: >>13280757 >>13283527

>>13273031
There's a backhanded acknowledgement in it that all of their bullshit really is fake. They know races aren't all equal and that they will never be a woman. They're just celebrating the fact that they can get everyone to pretend lies are true.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 13:43:49 No.13273253 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
also
>>13269585
>>13272685
1+1+1= there's five threads already!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 14:17:01 No.13273335 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
This is just a matter of semantics. II + II = IIII if we were using the roman system. Any number can mean anything as long as we assign a universal meaning to it.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1523130872269.jpg, 3KiB, 250x244

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 15:17:03 No.13273467 Report

Quoted By:

>>13273002
>eat out a penis

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 15:51:13 No.13273556 Report

Quoted By: >>13274887

>>13272947
>you can use a definition/interpretation completely contrary to the one everyone else uses
That's giving these retards too much credit they completely make up their own definitions to for the exclusive purpose of forcing 2+2=5. Their argument has no basis in reality whatsoever.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 15:57:39 No.13273575 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272947
Well said

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 16:10:49 No.13273613 Report

Quoted By: >>13274887

2+2=5 is a commie dog whistle
this is a /pol/ thread
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_%2B_2_%3D_5

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 16:25:39 No.13273640 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272947
yup

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1615403164549.jpg, 60KiB, 720x832

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 21:46:06 No.13274690 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
They are doing that shit again where they convince everybody of a wrong answer so that they can call them gullible for trusting trustworthy sources.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 21:53:11 No.13274714 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
there are 4 lights

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 21:55:28 No.13274725 Report

Quoted By:

>>13273045
>Isn't it a literal quote from 1984?
That's why they're choosing it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 22:04:16 No.13274764 Report

Quoted By: >>13274833 >>13279703 >>13281625 >>13282504

>>13272941
2+2 could very well be equal to 5. We simply don't know. It's impossible to prove that mathematics capable of doing simple arithmetic is consistent.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 22:24:08 No.13274833 Report

Quoted By: >>13274836 >>13274840

>>13274764
I choose Peano arithmetic with standard Hindu-Arabic notation to denote 0 and its successors

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 22:25:11 No.13274836 Report

Quoted By:

>>13274833
My bad, "zero" and its successors

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 22:26:23 No.13274840 Report

Quoted By:

>>13274833
Your point being?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1623449055409.png, 2MiB, 1080x1629

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 22:31:43 No.13274845 Report

Quoted By:

They're trying to assign genders to numbers to justify their subjective experiences. 2+2=4 biologically but if I feel like 2 is no longer equal to 2 but can be a combination of 2 or 3 depending on position say additive, 2+2=5.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1595439215532.jpg, 186KiB, 1024x582

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 22:46:06 No.13274887 Report

Quoted By: >>13275440 >>13276101

>>13272941
>>13272942
>>13272947
Math is a language. Who cares how you describe the apple. Explain how it got there.

>>13273556
>Their argument has no basis in reality whatsoever.
Reality doesn't rely on rock monkey ways of describing reality.

>>13273045
>>13273613
>Isn't it a literal quote from 1984?
Communism requires logomachy because ultimately it has no real foundation. Also contradictions and irony smeared into a grey area of understanding which is why every country that became communist has followed the formula of having the lowest 1% victim citizens that no one cares about propped up like golden cows in order to get the other 99% pitted against each other, arguing over issues that only that 1% actually cares about. Cutting your dick off? Putting a dick on yourself? Rights to kill your own babies? Using a language to describe quantities a different way, but never accounting for what is actually being counted? I just want to grill for Gods sake.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Jun 2021 23:21:42 No.13274994 Report

Quoted By: >>13275604

>>13272947
Practically applying this bullshit logic makes the concept of language completely meaningless and pointless tho

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 00:18:42 No.13275192 Report

Quoted By:

2+2 will never equal 5 and trannies will never be real women. This is objective truth.
Anyone trying to redefine or use mathematic trickery to bend the answer needs their teeth kicked in.
2+2 will always = 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 01:34:25 No.13275440 Report

Quoted By: >>13281646

>>13274887
>Reality doesn't rely on rock monkey ways of describing reality.
yes it does, QUANTUM physics defines our lowest levels anon. everything in reality is a discrete quantity.

two rocks plus two rocks will always be four

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1984.jpg, 116KiB, 900x699

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:03:07 No.13275516 Report

Quoted By:

1984:
2+2=5

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 2+2=5 tattoo.jpg, 282KiB, 2000x1500

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:10:58 No.13275535 Report

Quoted By:

Hail the Big Brother!

He's Doubleplus-plus-good.

Thought-criminals must be purged.

Memory hole the Oldspeak, Hail the Newspeak

2+2=4 is oldthink is crimethink that must be rectified

2+2=5 is goodthink

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1595811353712.webm, 3MiB, 406x320

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:22:55 No.13275573 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
Of course! I'm so foolish! Tyrone didn't get 2 + 2 wrong because he was dumb, he got it wrong because he's a genius unwilling to be constrained by white math!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:36:49 No.13275604 Report

Quoted By: >>13275610

>>13274994
The concept of language is every bit as meaningless regardless if you apply this logic.
If you remove the word "apple" from everyone's memory there would still be trees adorning a sweet yet slightly bitter fruit of red, green, or yellow - and it would still have thousands of other names in various other languages.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:39:00 No.13275610 Report

Quoted By: >>13275647

>>13275604
So the million tranny genders dont exist because without language theyre gone?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:41:13 No.13275615 Report

Quoted By: >>13279778

Yes boils axioms in math and what Russell and co tried to do in the early 1900s before Godel.. According to well established the ZFC axioms you can define 2+2=4 in this way. You can therefore define 2+2=5 in another way (notice those new axoims are never defined for people who go with the 2+2 = 5 idea). They're trying to lift this careful math analogy into a oblique social observation, probably muh white people made the rules what if our rules are better. Maybe they're the same, but our rules have just as much, in fact probably more considering "the past", legitimacy as yours so. Especially in Europe and America. Nothing is really correct... well your views are in doubt at least. Just look at math!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 02:56:10 No.13275647 Report

Quoted By:

>>13275610
Your obsessive tranny shitposting brings up a good point:
What really defines these modern "genders"?
Some of them are tied to more conventional sex traits like non-binary - which is just not being overly male or female.
But what about some random bullshit like "xenogender"? It's apparently defined as the gender of "concepts that most people don't think of as having to do with gender". But how can a gender be expressed through things that don't relate to gender? As an idea "xenogender" exists - but how real is it in comparison to something so obviously defined as male and female? If language didn't exist the concepts of male and female would still be around, but would "xenogender"?
Also, stop letting trannies live rent free in your head.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 03:56:49 No.13275768 Report

Quoted By: >>13275780

>>13272941
I define wrong as right
So everything is right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 04:03:03 No.13275780 Report

Quoted By:

>>13275768
>So everything is right.
You got that part wrong. Although everything is still equal my part is more right, because your part is right is wrong because of historical-religious reasons. And if you don't admit your part is wronger in this sense that means you're even more wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 04:12:46 No.13275800 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
You were taught math on the real numbers.
Not all numbers are as flexible.
There are many other number systems with which behave differently and school just didn't tell you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 04:15:53 No.13275807 Report

Quoted By: >>13275825

>>13272941
https://www.amren.com/videos/2021/02/rooting-out-white-supremacy-in-math/

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1622514759293.png, 80KiB, 1093x660

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 04:25:07 No.13275825 Report

Quoted By:

>>13275807
Everyone teacher who peaches this crap should have to go teach in an inner city majority black classroom in america to see what this garbage does to white and black kids

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 04:30:13 No.13275842 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
S = 4
(t. Phd in irony)

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Smugjak.jpg, 48KiB, 1024x1024

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 04:58:16 No.13275912 Report

Quoted By:

If $2+2=4$ is not an objective truth then there is no chance of the supposed "historical truth" of the hall-of-costs happening being an objective truth either; your move kikes...

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 05:05:17 No.13275944 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
>Kareem
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 05:18:44 No.13275987 Report

Quoted By:

Anyone interested in what the leftist activists are up to with this can learn in depth about it here from mathematician James Lindsay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA1Md__9i9U

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 05:58:11 No.13276101 Report

Quoted By: >>13279806 >>13281646

>>13274887
go back to /pol/ you tourist

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO winston pls.png, 349KiB, 992x560

Anonymous Mon 14 Jun 2021 21:20:29 No.13278392 Report

Quoted By:

I don't know...

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO AnnoyedPepe.jpg, 63KiB, 1337x1289

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 06:00:32 No.13279703 Report

Quoted By:

>>13274764
Peano Arithmetic is consistent you pseud.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentzen's_consistency_proof#:~:text=It%20shows%20that%20the%20Peano,not%20contain%20any%20contradictions%20either.
>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/446084/does-some-proof-of-arithmetics-consistency-exist

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 06:44:00 No.13279770 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272996
Oh I read his article. It's even stupider than the title

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 06:51:35 No.13279778 Report

Quoted By:

>>13275615
Oh dude, you give him way too much credit. The guys argument was literally some apples are bigger than others so sometimes these 4 apples are more than those 4 apples, and therefore 2+2 big apples = more than 4 avg apples.

Which in reality if you want to account for exact weight or volume than you count weight or volume, not the quantity of entities.

The dude really thought we have a shitty system for counting when in reality he just had a shitty (inconsistent) recipe for apple pies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 07:09:00 No.13279805 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
>using average estimations which are well defined in math as an argument
>using a well defined equation to show that the speed of light cannot be exceeded as an argument
>using cyclic groups as an argument

These are all instances that have well defined implications, so any mathematician, physicist or scientist would understand why those numbers behave the way they do.

Normies and woke folk don't understand this and use it as a weapon in their identity politics arsenal.

Is any of this even real?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 011.png, 96KiB, 491x567

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 07:09:47 No.13279806 Report

Quoted By:

>>13276101
>go back to /pol/ you tourist

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 13:42:59 No.13280677 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
•• + •• = ••••

simple

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 14:16:59 No.13280757 Report

Quoted By:

>>13273215
this. it's basically a dogwhistle

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1620126112589.gif, 2MiB, 360x360

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 14:18:01 No.13280760 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
if
>1+1=2
>2+1=3
>3+1=4
>a+b=b+a
>(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)
are true, then
>2+2=4
is true

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1984.jpg, 1MiB, 762x1170

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 14:32:49 No.13280784 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
why are there so many people who want to fulfill the prophecy of 1984?

To the all-powerful State, Smith's belief in objective math was a threatening form of insanity. The State therefore used a mixture of torture and cajoling to force Smith to embrace a State-sanctioned "sanity" that denied reality:

"You are a slow learner, Winston."
"How can I help it? How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane."

By the novel's end, with the State's torture having broken him, Smith readily conceded that, yes, if the State said that two plus two equals five, that would be the correct answer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 19:51:45 No.13281625 Report

Quoted By:

>>13274764
Fuck you for being stupid enough to misunderstand the Incompleteness Theorems this badly.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO GrIFVNjUTGraEWYR9-rrS9mXMtkYyI-J (...).jpg, 40KiB, 600x453

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 19:58:59 No.13281646 Report

Quoted By: >>13281674

>>13275440

>QUANTUM physics defines our lowest levels anon
"of what". What are you talking about? Pure "numbahs"?

>everything in reality is a discrete quantity.
Of what?

>two rocks
Oooh, "rocks" gotcha. That's not a "number". It's a rock.

>>13276101
Why are you mad?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 20:09:08 No.13281674 Report

Quoted By: >>13281712

>>13281646
For all my life science has been in alignment with my leftist ideology. Why should I welcome in the evil opposition who hates me? Science was so much easier before /pol/ showed up.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1623738625795.jpg, 68KiB, 619x465

Anonymous Tue 15 Jun 2021 20:29:08 No.13281712 Report

Quoted By:

>>13281674
>For all my life science has been in alignment with my leftist ideology.

And you call me the /pol/ tourist?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 00:55:26 No.13282444 Report

Quoted By:

Answer me, Winston.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 01:07:42 No.13282486 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
It's a demoralization psyop meant to unironically make people feel confused and dumb.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 01:09:06 No.13282491 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272942
/thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 01:12:38 No.13282504 Report

Quoted By:

>>13274764
bait

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1+1=2.png, 43KiB, 800x333

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 07:11:39 No.13283434 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
this is not a simple question actually

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 07:14:49 No.13283446 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
We have an agreed upon number system where 2+2 equals 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 07:23:42 No.13283475 Report

Quoted By:

>>13272941
>Schizo maths
So anyone in this world can take 2 apples in one hand and other 2 on the other hand and get 5 apples? if anyone can do that maybe that, well maybe that have any sense if don't are just a schizo mathematicians larping

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Jun 2021 07:48:49 No.13283527 Report

Quoted By:

>>13273215
this

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches