>>13268597The problem with your "ethical position" is that you're likely to die to people sharing humanity with you if you don't engage with them having certain expectations. Hell, maybe even as a result of engaging with them at all.
Unfortunately, the same way pitbulls can reasonably be expected to do violent shit in moments of caprice(bred to be that way ofc)... Niggers can be expected to do the same(bred outside of a system with delayed gratification for millenia). If you don't harbor that expectation, you leave yourself vulnerable to becoming part of a statistic (you could be on the receiving end of the 50% from the 13/50)
Eugenics imo, could be just a meta societal dating process. The same way people on an individual level select for traits they want in partners and make more people that therefore carry those selected traits, eugenics would just be a collective selection of desired traits that could advance society more efficiently. This obviously holds negative consequences for the dredges of humanity and is vulnerable to subterfuge by groups with less than good intentions.
Racism is a sensible way to preclude possible problems that would arise from the union of unequal gene pools. It's been propagandized into some terrible thing based on the idea that there are no differences between people that are obvious. It's had people cherry pick examples of why it shouldn't apply. And yet today we live in a world where millions of people operate in their host society obeying it's rules, paying their taxes, trying to raise their kids... and they are leeched off of by a community of ungrateful niggers begging, raging, rioting, burning, and ever demanding for more.