>>13267973how incredibly dimwitted do you have to be to believe that magic time warps really lie beyond an event horizon just because some clowns on tv say so? anyone who had scratched the surface on the topic can tell you that the people expressing certainty about what lies inside an event horizon are deluded. there are only three things that can be potentially estimated about whats inside: mass, spin and electric field.
even schrodinger should've known better than to conjecture about the legitimacy of black holes, his concept is based around fictitious, nonrotating objects which have never been observed in our universe. not only did he willfully ignore the effects rotating on a contracting body, he also didn't know that quarks exist when he made his conjecture more than a century ago. in the 50+ years since quarks were discovered, nobody has managed to come up with a reasonable calculation for quark degeneracy pressure.
plebs only imagine black holes exist because star trek hyped the idea, thinking that black holes exist requires a lack of understanding of math and physics and a matching lack of intellectual honesty.