>>13257968>society will never not be dynamicsociety goes through periods of stasis, you're a moron
>how . . . pronouns?>why . . .chromosomes? >even . . .necessary?You've had your warning. Not responding when all you do is answer with a series of mindless questions.
>i wish that were trueHA! no you don't you liar. You are obviously the type of idiot who loves different "gender expressions".. you don't wish they would go away.
>they still have gender as a concept if they use man and womanNO they don't you fucking moron man and woman simply means male and female sex. It's the same thing just like it used to be in english before progressive idiots like you hijacked language.
>which is why it's only really 'first world countries' that have queer people and queer discussionEstonia is a first world country. You are a moron tourist and need to leave /sci/
>again, i wish people never were.>even using terms like 'man' and 'woman' and attributing any quality to either is still defining people past their chromosomes unnecessarily. >people are defined past their chromosomes because of ancient hunter gatherer societiesBRAVO! Perfect 3x question dodge. Did not even remotely try to answer the question.
The question was WHY people need to be defined "past their chromosomes"
You merely gave your excuse you don't like that it happens (lie)
Then said it's unnecessary that characteristics are attributed to certain genders (irrelevant)
Then gave a contextual "it happens because" bullshit reason about ancient societies (wrong)
But you never answerd WHY people need to be defined past their chromosomes.
You asked me this question and I directly answered it by pointing out genders outside man or woman are irrelevant and unecessary because we can simply designate them by their chromosomes by equating gender = sex.
You have NOT answered why we need to define people past their chromosomes and thus invent new irrelevant genders.
