How about the idea, that wormholes leads to new big bangs?
I know that better known people like me suggested this idea before. BUT: Think of it.
The universe as a not linear objekt with one beginning and ending seems way more legit than: whup whup we started.... aaaaaaaaand thats it bye everyone and everything... It could be, but why state so many rules for a one way game??
I belive that one or more blackhloes leads to a white hole... also known as a big bang... Imagine: Black hole --> as Einstein posted on former 4Chan, light or better photns have no mass and are the fastest thing in the universe... so blackholes can ward space in a speed faster than light. where did the hole space go? Also we are stopped by the heisenberg uncertanty for looking at the big bang... but we know, back then there were a bunch of wobble-de-dobble-de hot and concentrated material...
So when the blackhole dont let light escape mavbe the whitehole dont let light to be followed to the beginning... I forecast that behind the heisenberg uncertanty there is a border that cant be crossed. Even massless things cant cross it, so things with mass cant cross that line for sure...
The next thing is, that Hawking proved that blackholes are radiated away by time... (the crazy thing with spontanious appearing electrons and positrons: If this happens near the border of the Schwarzschildradius, one of the two part fall into the blackhole and the other are doomed to stay alone like 90% of the regular 4Chan user - joke)
So blackhole decline with time of getting an unequvalent amount of charged particels... Whats the consequent?
- A thing soaking up material and but it in avery very small place. so smale that it curves space-time... but still decay over time... (I) to be continued
I know that better known people like me suggested this idea before. BUT: Think of it.
The universe as a not linear objekt with one beginning and ending seems way more legit than: whup whup we started.... aaaaaaaaand thats it bye everyone and everything... It could be, but why state so many rules for a one way game??
I belive that one or more blackhloes leads to a white hole... also known as a big bang... Imagine: Black hole --> as Einstein posted on former 4Chan, light or better photns have no mass and are the fastest thing in the universe... so blackholes can ward space in a speed faster than light. where did the hole space go? Also we are stopped by the heisenberg uncertanty for looking at the big bang... but we know, back then there were a bunch of wobble-de-dobble-de hot and concentrated material...
So when the blackhole dont let light escape mavbe the whitehole dont let light to be followed to the beginning... I forecast that behind the heisenberg uncertanty there is a border that cant be crossed. Even massless things cant cross it, so things with mass cant cross that line for sure...
The next thing is, that Hawking proved that blackholes are radiated away by time... (the crazy thing with spontanious appearing electrons and positrons: If this happens near the border of the Schwarzschildradius, one of the two part fall into the blackhole and the other are doomed to stay alone like 90% of the regular 4Chan user - joke)
So blackhole decline with time of getting an unequvalent amount of charged particels... Whats the consequent?
- A thing soaking up material and but it in avery very small place. so smale that it curves space-time... but still decay over time... (I) to be continued
