>>13246896Why was there not a single proper study done of early use of hydroxychloroquine?
The Lancet published a study which they subsequently retracted, once it had done its job (promoting remdesivir).
All the studies of it used it incorrectly, at later stages of illness. Do you really not think this was deliberate?
When exactly did you start to trust big pharmaceutical companies and stop thinking that they had too much lobbying power?
Do you really not think that the financial incentives of remdesivir (~$5000 per regimen) or patented vaccines had ANYTHING to do with the seeming urgency to discredit hydroxychloroquine (~$20 a regimen) and ivermectin (even cheaper)?
