>>13246687>Race is still something people think about, but it does no good because it doesn't actually biologically exist.Okay, so the point still stands. This isn't difficult to understand. If race doesn't "actually biologically exist" and thinking about race "Does no good", then it follows that blaming all white people for historical injustices and racism is retarded. IF thinking about races and talking about race is pointless and stupid, then it is also pointless and stupid to talk about race in connection with things like white privilege, colonialism, etc. You can't arbitrarily say that appeals to racial identity are acceptable when considering white privilege or historic racism, but then turn around and say that you can't bring up racial identity in connection with injustices committed by other races. You either have to accept discussion concerning the relationship between race and socioeconomic issues, or you have to rejected any discussion concerning the relationship between race and socioeconomic issues, but you can't arbitrarily pick and choose when race is relevant and when it isn't. Either race has relevance when discussing socioeconomic questions, in which case we are free to discuss it in connection with socioeconomics, or race has no relevance to socioeconomics, in which case you should stop bring up white people and how white culture and white identity is supposedly based on racism, violence, and oppression (ironically, if anything black culture is based on racism, violence, oppression, misogyny, etc. Blacks literally openly praise such values in their music and pop culture. )
