>>13239479>Here is an objection of 2019 and 2020 flu data being omitted because it's unreliable due to being provisional, all the while COVID data was included despite being provisional.This is what I said, it makes COVID look less dangerous than it is since the flu deaths are estimated above confirmed deaths while the COVID deaths are only confirmed deaths.
>Here's one mentioning the flu has a vaccine out which suppresses the numbers.It no more "suppresses the numbers" than social distancing and lockdowns "suppresses" COVID deaths.
>Here's one about how the flu and COVID are counted differently and not comparable in the way tgwhite tried.This is the same as what I already said above.
>Here's a similar one that explains in more detail how the COVID numbers get inflated whilst flu numbers suppressed due to different standards of counting.It's simply wrong, the COVID death counts are not based on secondary causes and the flu deaths are estimated above primary causes.
I see why you didn't want to actually write out these criticisms, since they completely fail to "tear" anything apart.
