>>13222782>If one theory is not complete then there is (or might be) a true claim about mathematics that cannot be proven. There is a confusion here.
What can be proven refers to a theory.
What is true has to refer to a model of the theory.
If a statement cannot be proved in the theory, it may be true in some models and false in other models.
>It would be a property of mathematics itself.Mathematics does not address "properties of mathematics".
>Alright, but look at who I am talking to. If you want to explain anything to the average /sci/-tard you have to use a
language that even toddlers can understand.
>That is what I said, I don't think he will benefit with being pedantic. I don't think he can appreciate the subtleties that you can.At a glance it did not seem like a subtlety, just irrelevant.
