>>13218882Yeah, sure. But it poses an interesting question on confirmation bias and the politically correct blindness to science.
>>13218886lmao, you see a something you don't agree with and immediately shout insults. Take a step back, think about your process.
This is the first time I've heard about this difference, and I immediately looked for what it means.
https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/behavior/biological-basis-of-behavior-ner/v/gray-and-white-matterExtrapolating from this you'd imagine men are far more intelligent, but the measured differences are miniscule, except on the fringes of the bell curve.
Is this just because of a large amount of 'defective men', as hypothesized by the greater male variability hypothesis? Do more men have bad wiring?
