>>13221449>You would throw people in jail the same way you throw people in jail for child pornographysure, add some punishment
in most nations you are not allowed to view pirated movies and will get punished for doing so, people still do it
people that are interested in porn will watch it anyways and just add security measures so they are not found out
>You wouldn't be able to find it online without a vpn or without the tor networkeven if the state would do geoblocking like not forwarding requests (like dns requests) for porn sites its only a question of time when people open a website over which you can circumvent the blocking
browser vpns exist for that very reason and are already used to get around geoblocking
>Vpns and the tor network achieve thisthats one option, and its already being used
>you need to be at least a little tech savvy to figure out how to use themnot really, downloading an application or just using a different browser (like TOR) that is a modified firefox, one of the default browsers is not very difficult
vpn technology as it is marketed is idiot proof and requires little to no understanding for the user
>The only middle schoolers who'd be watching porn would be the really nerdy ones who also already happen to have a desire to watch pornno, everyone when growing up was looking at porn of some kind, whether thats some magazine or female lingerie advertisements
it doesnt take much for a kid to type "boobs" in a searchbar and click on whatever comes up
the attraction to nude femininity is nothing that has to be discovered by looking at porn, but exists intrinsically in heterosexual males
basically every male when growing up watches porn, masturbates, etc. even when few publically admit to it (except to their friends)
geoblocking is idiotic, raising a 8 foot wall when 12 foot ladders exist and are widely available
ban on pornography is even more stupid, people will consume pornography, if thats over the internet or not, one click more or not
