Help me interpret my Visual evoked potential results

No.13201471 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Electrical engineering majors or stem people might help me as I have no stem background.

Went to have a VEP done as I have strange visual symptoms (distorted and dark patches in peripheral vision) Eye doctor said most likely is some kind of variation of visual snow based on the fact all testing on eyes was relatively normal. Referred me now to a neurologist.

He said my VEP results were slightly abnormal but nothing of significance.

Summary of my VEP results:
>Pattern VEP showed slight decreased amplitude to below the normal range in both eyes to all checksizes. We observed smallish p100 waves on the 15 minute checksize in both eyes but fairly normal responses to the large checksizes. We Did not identify any ocular pathology."

Like I said I don't have a stem background but it's saying I have "reduced p100 amplitude" right?

Now compare my results to this VEP study on people Visual Snow:

>Visual evoked potentials from patients with VS demonstrated increased N145 latency (in ms; VS: 152.7±7.9 vs. M: 145.3±9.8 vs. C: 145.5±9.4; F=3.28; p=0.046) and reduced N75?P100 amplitudes (in ?V; VS: 7.4±3.5 vs. M: 12.5±4.7 vs. C: 10.8±3.4; F=3.16; p=0.051).

Can someone compare my eye doctors findings with the study I posted above. Are my results consistent with the Visual Snow VEP results?

Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328683615_Evidence_of_dysfunction_in_the_visual_association_cortex_in_visual_snow_syndrome_Visual_evoked_potentials_in_visual_snow