so today I just solved 0^0 using hitomi numbers.
clearly the idea that infinity is a real number is retarded.
and if you agree with the infinite density maximum of numbers, via the hitomi critical, then you will need to know this:
Induction does not work on hitomi's number.
hitomi's number does not conclude that
2*0 = 1*0 <=> 2 = 1
I haven't full fleshed it out.
I suspect that coefficients need to be reduced before you can get an elementary return.
fist of all: hitomi's number is defined as h = 1/0.
all number eta...eta are in the Hitomi set H.
0 * h = 1
so onto 0^0
0^0 = 0/0
0 * x, x in R
inf is not a real number
this then contradicts the original idea.
just like there are complex numbers there are hitomi algebras.
0 * h is an example of a hitomi algebra.
as previously defined
0^0 = 1
where 1 is the elementary return, and I think I'll say 0 is the hitomi return.
Now I must decide wether or not h is a real number or not.
From my crux complications I think it's just an upper bound maybe inclusive or exclusive, maybe in favor of retaining definitions it's exclusive.
Also I feel better if anyone was wondering.
clearly the idea that infinity is a real number is retarded.
and if you agree with the infinite density maximum of numbers, via the hitomi critical, then you will need to know this:
Induction does not work on hitomi's number.
hitomi's number does not conclude that
2*0 = 1*0 <=> 2 = 1
I haven't full fleshed it out.
I suspect that coefficients need to be reduced before you can get an elementary return.
fist of all: hitomi's number is defined as h = 1/0.
all number eta...eta are in the Hitomi set H.
0 * h = 1
so onto 0^0
0^0 = 0/0
0 * x, x in R
inf is not a real number
this then contradicts the original idea.
just like there are complex numbers there are hitomi algebras.
0 * h is an example of a hitomi algebra.
as previously defined
0^0 = 1
where 1 is the elementary return, and I think I'll say 0 is the hitomi return.
Now I must decide wether or not h is a real number or not.
From my crux complications I think it's just an upper bound maybe inclusive or exclusive, maybe in favor of retaining definitions it's exclusive.
Also I feel better if anyone was wondering.
