>>13190243I don't know how many times I have said it in this thread, there is no why. It is governed by the principles of reality.
You're essentially asking "Why does reality have this specific set of physical characteristics."
THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC WHY.
Atheists will tell you the universe just happened to exist this way.
Multiverse bozos will tell you that we live in the universe where the physical constants are what they are.
Intelligent-designers will tell you that whomever designed the universe built these characteristics in.
Its like a clock. Why are the gears the way they are? because the clock works if they are.
Are there other configurations of gears in which the clock could work? sure. Why are they not that way? Because however the clock was made, was not that way.
>>13190252Yeah Ik I was agreeing with you :)
>>13190259Classical mechanics IS faulty (See UV catastrophe and Rydberg's Hydrogen atom). Also, say tight pussy to someone who doesn't speak English and they won't know what you mean. Say tight pussy to a theoretical alien race that doesn't have genders and they won't know what you mean. Mathematics is universally objective. It does not change. It is always correct.
>>13190261Except upon investigation of the validity of any statement, it could be found to be false. Math doesn't carry this caveat. If I say I OP is a fag, he just is. That doesn't necessarily mean its true, that's only a justification that can be proven false by other evidence.
If I say "Math is true, it just is" You cannot bring forth evidence which proves that statement wrong. Math will always be correct, which is why it is valid to state is it true.
You're right, its an axiomatic truth, of which there is no evidence against and perfectly describes observed reality. Go cry about how there is no why some more.
