>>13190740Lol. That's simply wrong, but nice try. No moral system is objective, sure. Though, with the goal of optimizing the species for survival, conclusion drawn from empirical analysis can inform moral stances which is quite litterally what I said, and you quoted. "Does this empirically make people less likely to survival? If yes, morally bad". Not really a difficult concept.
>>13190745/pol/ has a mishmash of conflicting opinions which have varying moral principles attached. The dominate moral paradigm does make a multitude of assumptions. Liberals, conservatives, and SJWs all subscribe to them. Equality good, racism bad, freedom good, etc. Notions of what denotes "fairness".
I do agree with your second paragraph.
I am racist, yes. Most people are. It's just natural to prefer your ingroup. Unless one is a white liberal anyway. Though, it's more a "race realism" stance. I see no reason to hate other races, and supremacy is going to only be relevant with set criteria. Saying a race is simply overall superior to another really doesn't say anything.
