/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13186500

251KiB, 1200x1200, 3356.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 25 May 14:45:31 2021 No.13186500 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13186509 >>13186717 >>13186720 >>13186726

Should he be considered a scientist among the rankings of Newton and Archimedes?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 14:47:38 No.13186507 Report

Quoted By: >>13186640

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 14:47:57 No.13186509 Report

Quoted By: >>13186640

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:24:25 No.13186640 Report

Quoted By: >>13186648

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:25:28 No.13186648 Report

Quoted By: >>13186658

>>13186640
no because his work isnt as consequential as newton

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:26:42 No.13186658 Report

Quoted By: >>13186710

>>13186648
>his work isnt as consequential as newton
Before him, nobody would even think of black holes emitting radiation

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:36:26 No.13186710 Report

Quoted By:

>>13186658
turns out the radiation of black holes isnt as consequential as laying the foundation for all of mechanics

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:38:09 No.13186717 Report

Quoted By:

>>13186500
why? his computer did all the work

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:38:33 No.13186720 Report

Quoted By:

>>13186500
No, maybe with einstein, probably a little lower though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 May 2021 15:40:05 No.13186726 Report

Quoted By:

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First