>>13179617No because his theories are not falsifiable, he was never meant to be scientific in the sense of strictly applying the scientific method "propose theory experiment contrast results reproduce". None of his followers will attempt to tell you otherwise, they won't claim to have"experimentally determined" something una double blind study, that's just not what they're after
The discipline of psychoanalysis is a weird mix between literature and sociology, and I don't think it's a bad approach if you actually want to approach the infinite complexity of the human mind and even more try to ease suffering.
