>>13180463>you are a shill paid to propagate bullshitoh am i? how did you come to that conclusion?
>it's not about scientists and expertswell the discussion is about credibility of scientific research, what an odd thing to say that "it's not about scientists and experts"
>it's about money behind themthis is the motivation of the scientist which could potentially taint their research
this is a good way of discrediting scientists, to bring up where their money comes from assert that their work must now be invalid
this will work with every scientist as there will always be someone that pays them
>never trust governmentyou dont like the government?
they do not directly influence scientists as much as companies that have scientist doing research for them do
for a scientist doing research on behalf of a big pharma corp could lose his job when his results dont match, so theres an incentive to manipulate
when you are a scientist that got his government funding or has a fixed job working at a university, the risk of getting shunned is typically much lower
why dont you like the government? you have the option to vote an influence who represents you and your beliefs.
>>13180447oh you dont like navalny?
so me showing that image of navalny makes me an NPC?
sounds wild.
>>13180482>i dont like your postad hominem, the low hanging fruit that even those with sub par intellect can reach
