>>13179855I do not want eternal recurrence to be true. Would you still recommend it?
>>13179710Common sense? How so?
a.] The universe is deterministic (or superdeterministic) b.] finite arrangement of matter c.] infinite time
Wasn't there something with LQG that shows there were previous big bangs and that had been confirmed? How is eternal return crazy? I'd say it's at the very least possible if not probable.
>>13179490I'm not really referencing Nietzsche when I say eternal return. He gained the inspiration from Poincare recurrence and it's debatable if he meant it as just a mere thought experiment. There are ways for this to be true.
