>>13176833Apparently physics having relatively simple and elegant models that explain neary fucking everything is a bad thing. Fucking kek, could anyone be more retarded?
If physics were not fragile, it would be a concoction of various messy explanations that contradict each other. Is that somehow better? Does this faggot think not having simple explanations that cover a lot of phenomena is desirable?
Also, even if current physics theories were disproven (GR and QM apparently contradict themselves in some places, but I'm a physicslet so I don't understand how), they would not be rendered useless. We know for a fact that Galilean relativity is wrong, but it's still so fucking useful. You don't use Einstein's velocity addition formula when calculating relative velocities, do you?
This 80 IQ Feyeraband shilling retard should learn what physics is about before going on a tirade about how physics is shitty and fragile.
