>>13168214>Not an argument. Please stop dismissing what I have to say. Argue in good faith.Nonsensical. Posturing.
>Answering a retort with a counter-retort isn't an argument. You're the one who's supposed to answer what was put in front of you instead of resorting to whataboutism.I told you that your retort is incorrect at the root, so all that derived from it is also net nonsense.
>Can't you just refer to your original post so you at least have an idea of what you're arguing about?Go on......
>Do you really? Do you have access to a hospital's computer network so you can personally judge the results of your radiologist's work[...]Yes. A lot of hospitals they'll just show you, others you cna request yyour records for like 5.00 for a disc, or some number of cents per page. I think it might even be 50c/page, I can't recall, but it seemed ridiculous.
>Do you have access to your mechanic's computer equipment so you can test for yourself what's wrong with your car?Scan tools (I have a really basic one) don't and can't catch everything. Most of the time you've got two main risks.
1) He lies to you about the extent of the problem and tries to replace a bunch of parts to charge you his markup and labor.
2) He screws something else up while he's at it so you'll be back later.
3) He fixes the wrong thing out of no malace whatsoever, and so the problem just moves around.
I had a mechanic where I pretty much just wandered around his shop while he worked, he also had me help. Due to insurance etc that's not at all the common case however, but a lot of them will show you, take pictures, explain, and so on, in my experience. This is them "making their case".
>You're backtracking on your own argument.This makes no sense to me, like the rest of your dyregulated state.
>>13168230You're the one accusing me of presenting a false dichotomy so why are you presenting me with one
I'm not presenting you with anything, I'm accusing.
