>>13164570No, because forces are not ordered. Likewise, there is no first, second, third, or fourth force.
Are there more than four forces? Yeah.
>>13164790He was grouping them linguistically because they are both nuclear forces. He was not claiming they are a single force. Notice how he was answering a request for a list of the four forces and his list only totals four items if strong and weak are considered two separate items. Cool it with the autism.
