>>13164403>>13164119>>13164403My god, you are retarded. Those are some of the shittiest sources of information there are. Tantamount to drinking the military industial complex's diarrhea.
>inb4 "The New York Times says it's a reliable source, why shouldn't I trust them?"Look it up nigger I ain't going to sponfeed you, but they lie for their own gain constantly.
If you actually want to check up on the news:
>cross check all the information you can find.>make sure the sources are listed. If they are, value their claims given what they have to gain and the evidence they present. if they're not, then the article is completely worthless.>make a list of experts in a certain area, and evaluate the value of their opinions based given a track-record.I'd recommend wikileaks, the kaiser report, and glenn greenwald as good sources. But you should find your own.
