I had a nasty thought about mRNA therapy that I'd like to explore with you. Read on only if you want the shit scared out of you once again by the hellhole hurtbox that is 4chan.
This is coming from a comment I just posted on /pol/, but I'm making this thread here because I actually want to discuss it.
Question: what's the fidelity of these mRNA COVID shots we're supposed to be getting? By which I mean:
* in every jab, there are millions of mRNA strands loaded into phospholipid membrane envelopes.
* Lyse the envelopes, collect strands, and sequence them to make a histogram of frequency of each base pair by position in the strand.
* Compare that to the target sequence -- i.e., what the sequence is SUPPOSED to be for the 'vax' to work -- using Jaccard Similarity & mutual information
--> How close are the jabs as made vs. what they're supposed to be?
--> How close do they NEED to be in order to work?
Now for the scary part: What if there is a sequence of mRNA that codes for something really nasty, and is quite close to the jab's target sequence? Are we sure that we won't wind up with something we definitely DONT want -- like a fucken prion or something -- just because some % of the mRNA strands in a jab aren't up to spec?
If that's true, 2 cases:
1) It's unintentional. Genuine oops guise, we didn't know because we didn't have enough time to do full testing.
2) It's intentional and that small % of mRNAs that code for the 'bad thing' was really the point all along, the goal being to get that protein expressed in people for reasons known only to those who designed the plan.
I think my thinking is: if it's justified to use emergency measures to mandate an mRNA 'vax', then that same emergency measure argument mandates that the makers publish their sequence at least, and preferably the 'recipe' for the lipid envelope and its transmembrane proteins.
pic sort of rel, it's what happens when you splice firefly DNA into a tobacco plant.
Thoughts?
This is coming from a comment I just posted on /pol/, but I'm making this thread here because I actually want to discuss it.
Question: what's the fidelity of these mRNA COVID shots we're supposed to be getting? By which I mean:
* in every jab, there are millions of mRNA strands loaded into phospholipid membrane envelopes.
* Lyse the envelopes, collect strands, and sequence them to make a histogram of frequency of each base pair by position in the strand.
* Compare that to the target sequence -- i.e., what the sequence is SUPPOSED to be for the 'vax' to work -- using Jaccard Similarity & mutual information
--> How close are the jabs as made vs. what they're supposed to be?
--> How close do they NEED to be in order to work?
Now for the scary part: What if there is a sequence of mRNA that codes for something really nasty, and is quite close to the jab's target sequence? Are we sure that we won't wind up with something we definitely DONT want -- like a fucken prion or something -- just because some % of the mRNA strands in a jab aren't up to spec?
If that's true, 2 cases:
1) It's unintentional. Genuine oops guise, we didn't know because we didn't have enough time to do full testing.
2) It's intentional and that small % of mRNAs that code for the 'bad thing' was really the point all along, the goal being to get that protein expressed in people for reasons known only to those who designed the plan.
I think my thinking is: if it's justified to use emergency measures to mandate an mRNA 'vax', then that same emergency measure argument mandates that the makers publish their sequence at least, and preferably the 'recipe' for the lipid envelope and its transmembrane proteins.
pic sort of rel, it's what happens when you splice firefly DNA into a tobacco plant.
Thoughts?
