>>13156704the causes fand thus solutions are ultimately political. at the heart is that science is expensive, what gets done ends up controlled by rigorously economical and profit-motive collectives, replication doesn't pay like discovering and patenting (or truly hoarding, never disclosing, developing in secret). then there's the total debasement of the entire concept of 'science' by the 'social sciences' (especially the 'epidemiology' propaganda-headline-generation racket).
the solutions would start narrowly with ousting the entire 'social sciences' corruption and restoring standards for publication, but would have to extend broadly to BROAD societal reforms to our entire 'economic' system. ie. actually dealing with the issue of human labor obsolescence due to having solved the problem of production in a constructive way instead of the near-exclusively destructive and consumptive ways we've chosen. there should be 100x more 'scientists' than there are.
