>>13150000>I'm not a libertarian so this doesn't bother me.Oh so, you're a fascist idiot, got it. I hope the democrats chemically castrate you in the first testing phase of your eugenics program.
>UnprovenProven. Do you really think people would have 8 children if they had access to contraceptives and better living conditions? People in poor areas tend to have many children to support themselves through child labor. If you increased access to healthcare and services in rural areas, and lowered welfare payments in urban ones, the poor in both would have no reason to reproduce beyond replacement. Do you really think the US government paying Lashonda an extra 500 dollars a month for every baby she pops out isn't incentivising her to keep having children? All you have to do is get rid of that payment and millions of new "dysgenics" would stop being born.
>We've had that since the dawn of manNo you have not. Even in the worse times, the social underclass had some sort of social mobility for their children. You are creating a class with ZERO generational social mobility.
>Eugenics is the only long term solutionIt is not. Being part of the underclass is a relative social measure, not an absolute one. It will always exist.
>Science has made tremendous progress.By the time the entire human genome has been mapped, and every gene has been studied in a polygenetic fashion, technology will be so advanced that there will be no need for every individual to be a superman.
>It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs and roses. Why wouldn't it work for humans?Selective breeding is not eugenics, no breed is "superior" to another. They are adapted for different conditions. There is no ideal condition to adapt EVERY human for.
