>>13158766>>the one you described favorably is more effective>Yes, it it. Very obviously so.>>you implied it>You're delusional.yeah okay
>So all of mathematics is nothing then? Okay.mathematics doesnt claim physical relevance you fucking retard
learn the analytic synthetic distinction
>I argued.you just said its obvious, thats only an argument from incredulity
and guess what you dumb undergrad, science isnt about arguments
its about experiments and predictive validity
you can argue that the lorentz transformation is bullshit and galilean is the only correct one
you could argue the opposite
you can argue for your favorite pet mechanism that justifies your vaccine fetish
you can argue the opposite
but its only the experiments that tells you whats correct
you can argue for anything you fucking want,
but reality has no reason to listen to you. Math, logic, and arguments are human constructions
thats why we havent "moved past the need for experiments" which is what youre implying
but then again, you dont know what that word means