>>13148218No, more subtle than that. Cunts like me are going to become more prominent. Natural Resource management cunt here. You would be surprised at the shit we do. We evaluate the true cost of doing anything. Want to buy a steak? Well us cunts are going to figure out how much environmental cost it is to take the land, raise the cattle, the distribution, the marketing, the packaging. Could have been a rain forest growing on that land. We cost that. How much pollution is caused to the environment by trucking those happy cows off to the slaughter house? We cost that. All that packaging, what is the environmental cost of that? Don't worry, we will figure it out. And so on for every last tiny detail associated with that steak, the cost to pick up, recycle, dispose of safely, the cost of cleaning the air, water, land, the opportunity cost of the missing forest, even the fucking environmental cost of the electricity needed to power the slaughter house. Then we add it all up and come up with a figure that represents what it costs to put things right, or at the least to represent the damage. Then we trot off and give our shit to Governments who are just beginning ( finally ) to listen to what should have been fucking obvious to anyone. Eventually they will then use our data and costings to add an environmental tax to products. All products. Food, hair spray, laptops, shoes, you name it, we will have a cost for it.
So in the case of your steak you are going to find yourself paying $10 for the steak and then $20 environmental cost tax, then any of the other taxes your area may have. That's not an exaggeration by the way. Our analysis so far indicates that the hidden environment cost of most consumer products are between 200 to 3000 %. Yup, no joking. Its that bad. But dont worry too much just yet, it will still take some time to kick in, and no Government is stupid enough to make price hikes of that magnitude overnight. It will be far more gradual, step by step.
